Showing posts with label neuro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neuro. Show all posts

Syncope guide 2019

A new guide on our site on Syncope! Often overly investigated and common pitfalls abound.

See our guide section here - https://singem.blogspot.com/p/downloads.html

Link is here for pdf.

Comments and edits of course welcome.




Webucation 5/9/18

This episode of webucation gives us insights into old diseases and new. From cardio to dermatology and from myth to righteousness. Credit as always to the original content providers.

  • Severe cutaneous reactions - a great run through one of my blindspots - dermatology. It sets out the differences and nuances of treatment of SJS / TENS etc

Webucation 5/5/18


Web wisdom this round comes from gurus in EBM, critical care, trauma and even some philosophers on the state of affairs in medical education/administration. Credit as always to the original content providers.
  • The trouble with mindfulness - one of the best articles I have read recently relating to error prevention and human behaviour. Well worth a read even if not in a "medical" mood.

Webucation 30/8/17

Webucation this time comes from subjects encompassing departmental ethos, paediatric and adult trauma, ECG dilemmas and even TED talk skills. As always credit to the original content creators. Do visit their sites.
The last 2 links are worth the listen on your way home or on a jog. They describe and portend resuscitation at its best when elements align. Both talks show what can be if we get the heady mix of training, tech and guts right.

Webucation 26/4/17


This edition of web wisdom hails from the realms of paeds and adult neurology with a smattering of tox and how to move patients. Credit to the original content creators.

The last link makes you garner some perspectives. Would you really give snake venom to yourself or your loved ones? Know the whole argument prior to making your mind up.

CT after CA... worth it?

Here's a good nugget of food for thought from Medscape. We do this too. Outcomes are yet to be viewed though.

SUMMARY AND COMMENT | EMERGENCY MEDICINE

January 13, 2017
Daniel M. Lindberg, MD Reviewing Reynolds AS et al., Resuscitation 2017 Jan 3;
Many computed tomography scans showed abnormalities in this retrospective study, but it's not clear that performing early head CT improved care.
Neurological emergencies can result in cardiac arrest, and neurological injury can occur as a result of cardiac arrest. These authors retrospectively assessed the utility of head computed tomography (CT) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who survived for at least 24 hours at a single academic center from 2007 to 2015.
Of 213 patients in the analysis, 115 (54%) underwent head CT within 24 hours. In 43 patients (20% of all patients; 37% of those who underwent head CT), head CT showed abnormalities, such as loss of gray-white differentiation, global cerebral edema, and ischemic stroke. The authors note that head CT findings led to changes in management in 15 patients. These changes included transfer to the neurological intensive care unit, repeat head CT, and neurosurgical consultation alone; only one patient underwent neurological surgery. Of patients for whom CT findings changed management, only one survived, in a persistent vegetative state.
Comment
The limited clinical significance of the CT findings and of the resulting management changes does not make a compelling case to expand the use of CT scans. In patients stable enough for imaging, head CT should be obtained if pre-arrest symptoms or the neurological exam suggest a neurological source for the arrest or if the patient had significant head trauma.

Not another headache!


Here is another of our EM residents - Gayathi Nadarajan
She discusses 3 cases of non-traumatic headaches and their diagnoses with a focus on the evaluation of a patient with acute headache in the ED


Case 1:

A 19-year-old Chinese lady with a background of haemolytic anemia presented in the middle of the night with a 3-day history of the worst headache of her life with neck stiffness. On examination, besides profound neck stiffness, there were no other neurological findings.


FullSizeRender-11

CT scan: Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage in the left frontal lobe and acute subdural hemorrhage over the left frontal temporal convexity. Midline shift of 4mm to the right.

4 vessel angiogram : There were no aneurysm

Platelets: normal

All investigations were not completed as patient discharged against advice. Hence no cause was found for her non-traumatic bleed.

=============================================

Case 2

33-year-old Malay lady with no medical problems as such, presented to the ED with a sudden onset, thunderclap headache, associated with vomiting, left ankle weakness and foot drop. She also noted bruising over her left ring finger tip a few days ago.

Examination revealed a left foot drop and weak ankle inversion with sensory deficit over the dorsum of the foot.

FullSizeRender IMG_0013

CT brain: Basal cisterns & pre-pontine SAH, small ICH, superior cerebellar arachnoid cyst & earl communicating hydrocephalus.

CT angiogram: 3mm aneurysm at epicenter of left PCA branch

4 vessel angiogram: Possible mycotic aneurysm of P4 segmental branch of left posterior cerebral artery likely septic emboli or seeding from IE.

Unsuccessful in coiling the aneurysm

She than had craniotomy and excision of the aneurysm.

Transthoracic echocardiogram: bileaflet MVP with severe MR and IE 1.4cmx1.0cm anterior leaflet and 0.5cm posterior leaflet vegetation

Hence a diagnosis of mycotic aneurysm from infective endocarditis was made.

=============================================

Case 3

A 66-year-old independent and active Chinese gentleman presented to the emergency department as his blood pressure was noted to be high. He has hypertension and hyperlipidemia He routinely measures his blood pressure once a day and yesterday it was as high as 172/70 after measuring for about 3 times. His children than convinced him to come to the ED for a ‘check-up’ as they were worried about the high blood pressure.

He also had a headache for the past 3 days, which was resolving. It wasn’t the worse pain he ever felt but it was the first time he had such a headache. There were no associated or aggravating symptoms with the headache.

On examination, he was very well and had no neurological deficit. His blood pressure at triage was in fact 149/73.

In view of the new onset of headache in his age group, a CT head was ordered.

IMG_0007

CT brain: Hyperdense enlargement of the left transverse and sigmoid venous sinuses suspicious for venous sinus thrombosis, complicated by an area of venous infarction & haemorrhage in left parietal lobe

MRI venous: Cerebral venous thrombosis involving the entire left transverse and sigmoid sinuses extending to the proximal internal jugular vein. There is involvement of the left superior and inferior petrosal sinuses and secondary left temporoparietal venous infarction with haemorrhage.

No identifiable cause on MRI.

Patient was diagnosd with cerebral venous thrombosis. He was investigated and started on anticoagulant.

=============================================

Discussion

Don’t worry… you are not alone….

While in the consult room, it is normal to have the sinking feeling at the bottom of our stomachs when you are faced with yet another patient with a headache. We know that the headache consult will be a long one indeed. A thorough history taking and examination is crucial to avoid missing an intracerebral bleed.

Headache red flags

For the first 2 cases, the severe, thunderclap headache was a red flag. However, for the 3rd case, it was not obvious as the triage complain was ‘high blood pressure’. But his pressure at triage was fine!

The red flag only came out from ‘digging out’ the history from him. He said “By the way doctor… I did have this headache for the pass 3 days… it actually is getting better. The severity was probably the worst when I measured my blood pressure yesterday. I don’t normally suffer from headaches, but neither would I say this is the worse pain I ever felt!” The red flag was the new onset of headache in a patient above the age of 40

Discussion and more algortithms!!!

The aim of these cases is to:
  • Re-emphasise the value of good history taking in order to avoid missing out a deadly diagnosis such as a intracerebral bleed
  • To revisit red flags that may suggest a bleed
  • Despite the triage complain, ALWAYS ask the patient why they turned up in the ED on that particular day and at that particular time
I will end off with some algorithms, to remind us of headache red flags.

The following from Up To Date is a flowchart on how to approach a patient with headache in the emergency department.



IMG_0003

IMG_0002



Unknown



Reference
  • Perry, Jeffrey J., et al. "An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule." CJEM06 (2009): 516-522.
  • Perry, Jeffrey J., et al. "High risk clinical characteristics for subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients with acute headache: prospective cohort study." Bmj 341 (2010): c5204.
  • Perry, Jeffrey J., et al. "Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache." Jama12 (2013): 1248-1255.
  • Godwin SA, Villa J. “Acute headache in the ED: Evidence-Based Evaluation and Treatment Options.” Emerg Med Pract 2001; 3(6): 1-32.
  • Newman-Toker, David E., and Jonathan A. Edlow. "High-stakes diagnostic decision rules for serious disorders: the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule." JAMA12 (2013): 1237-1239.
  • http://www.emlitofnote.com/2013/10/the-ottawa-sah-rule.html
  • http://www.emdocs.net/acute-headache-emergency-department/
  • http://thesgem.com/2013/10/sgem48-thunderstruck-sah/


Webucation 25/3/16

This episode of webucation is brought to you by the disciplines of crit care and cardio as well as some imaging thrown in. Do visit/credit the content creators.
This last link is worth the read into current state of affairs. I you must take anything from it, take this pic. An all too forgotten philosophy that one must be complete and holistic, not just a paper reader/quoter.


EBM

Fencing with snake venom

Lots has been said and lots will be said about tPA in stroke. It matters not which side of the fence you trek so long as you acknowledge that there isaonther side (ie. the fence exists). 

Here is a well put critique of the recent AHA/ASA update

It is worthwhile noting that ACEM and ACEP have updated position statements on this subject. Rightly reflecting that clinicians should neither be lulled nor bullied into poor decisions for our patients.

For those who want a concise summary of the opposing view, go to this site. Here's a succinct snapshot for those with less time:


Low dose special K

Here's a video from Prof Larry Mellick which demostrates the efficacy of low dose Ketamine (as an infusion) for neuropathic pain. Ketamine, for those that who are unaware, can be used for the following purposes quite safely. Here is St Emlyn's view on this.

  • Analgesia
  • RSI (most useful in trauma)
  • Maintenance of sedation (ventilated patients)
  • Procedural sedation (esp for children)



For more of his great videos, go here.

Webucation 12/10/14

Web wisdom this time comes from the realms of trauma and radiology mostly. There's also a treat for Star Trek fans and airway enthusiasts all wrapped in one funny promo...


The last link was a promo for the SMACC conference. Semi decent lip-synching but the medical satire is pure gold. Admit it... this has happened in your ED in some shape or form!

Webucation 29/3/14

We're happy to be back and we bring you some tasty bits of med-ed from the realms of paeds, ob/gyn, surgery and even some philosophy. Credit as always to the content creators.
The last link is close to our hearts. We deal with such "traditions" day in/day out. We thank such innovators in bringing to light the remedies in such scientific form.

Webucation 17/2/14

This round of web publications comes from wonderful websites talking about paediatrics, radiology, neurosurgery and even some pharma thrown in. Be sure to visit the content creators.

  • Another radio myth? - Can we finally let go of this myth? 
  • Difficult though it may be to admit that we have been misled all this time. Could it be that we finally need a cross specialty study to finally end this conjecture -  for future generations sake...

    Webucation 18/11/13

    We took a break for some family vacations but are back with more web trails for you. Meducation continues with snippets from paeds, cardio, trauma and good old "robots replacing us" prophecies!
    • Stop shouting! - This last article is a great illustration that EDs, institutional practices and medical staff interaction are the same around the world. There's always comfort in the chaos if you keep the channels of communications open though. 

    Not far enough - an airway video

    Here is a a superb video by Dr Larry Mellick's team. It shows a not so frequent complication during an RSI procedure. It reminds us of the doctrine of check, recheck and check again after performing critical procedures. The patient was saved by constant monitoring and a high index of suspicion.



    Be sure to follow more of Dr Mellick's videos here.

    Webucation 1/5/13


    Here's more friendly pearls from the web. Mixture of surgery, radio and tons of paeds for good measure. 

    The really interesting link is #5. I was taught impulse testing and other subtle tests to remember for detecting acute appendicitis but never subtle history taking!


    Remember to credit the content providers.

    Stroke, Thrombolysis, NIHSS .....

    We've recently had a Great Thrombolysis Debate in our ED.

    But would like to summarise (I've cut and pasted the rev bits) what I read in sev EM papers some time back on some controversial area together with the references below:

    A.  Acute Stroke, Neuroimaging, and Thrombolysis

        MRI is at least equal in efficacy to CT for detection of ICH in the hyperacute stroke patient, and both appear to have very high sensitivity and specificity. MRI is superior to CT for demonstration of subacute and chronic hemorrhage and hemorrhagic transformation of an acute ischemic stroke.

        MR-DWI (diffusion weighted imaging MR) is far superior to unenhanced CT and routine MRI in the detection of acute ischemia, with very high sensitivity and specificity. For a patient within 3 hours of symptom onset, MRI can be used if it does not unduly delay the timely administration of IV tPA since a more definitive diagnosis will be obtained with MR-DWI and it is far more effective than CT for excluding some mimics of acute cerebral ischemia.

        For patients beyond 3 hours from onset of symptoms, either MR-DWI or CTA should be performed, especially if mechanical thrombectomy or intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy is contemplated.

        Frank hypointensity on CT, particularly if it involves more than one third of an MCA territory, is a strong contraindication to treatment with thrombolysis. Early signs of infarct on CT, regardless of their extent, are not a contraindication to treatment.

        Gradient-echo MR can detect microhemorrhage, both old and new, better than CT, indicating the presence of amyloid angiopathy, hypertension, small vascular malformations, and other vascular diseases. The presence of a small number of these microhemorrhages (< 5) does not contraindicate intravenous thrombolysis.

    Reference: Latchaw RE,et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Stroke 2009;40(11):3646-78.




    B.  Stroke Thrombolysis: Unique Exclusion Criteria for the 3 - 4.5 Hour Window

    Exclusion criteria unique to the 3 -4.5 hour window:

        Age > 80 years
        History of prior stroke AND diabetes
        Oral anticoagulant treatment prior to admission (even if INR <1.7)
        Severe stroke: NIHSS >25
        CT findings involving stroke > 1/3 of the MCA territory

    References:
    (1) Carpenter CR, et al. Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke beyond Three Hours J Emerg Med 2010 Jun 23. [Epub ahead of print]
    (2) Wahlgren N, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 h after acute ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study Lancet 2008;372:1303–1309.
    (3) Hacke W, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–1329.
    (4) Massachusetts General Hospital Stroke Service Protocols: http://www2.massgeneral.org/stopstroke/PostIVtPA345window2.aspx

    C.  Early CT Signs of Ischemic Stroke

    The NINDS Study found a 31% sensitivity for early signs of ischemic stroke on noncontrast CT within 3 hours of symptom onset. The rate of detection increased to 82% at 6 hours (1).

    Early signs of cerebral ischemia on CT:

        Hypoattenuation of brain tissue - with ischemia, cytotoxic edema develops resulting in increased brain water content. There is a loss of gray-white differentiation because of the increase in the relative water concentration within the ischemic tissues.

        With edema, swelling of the gyri produces sulcal effacement, which may lead to ventricular compression.

        Hyperdense MCA sign - a result of thrombus or embolus in the MCA.

        Obscuration of the lentiform nucleus (also called blurred basal ganglia) is seen in MCA infarction and is one of the most frequently seen signs.

        Insular Ribbon sign refers to hypodensity and swelling of the insular cortex (the center of the cerebral cortex deep between the temporal lobe and the frontal lobe).

    The sooner these signs become evident, the more profound is the degree of ischemia (1,2). Typically, at 6-12 hours sufficient edema is recruited into the stroke area to produce significant regional hypodensity on CT; a large hypodense area present within 3 hours of reported symptom onset should prompt careful review regarding the time of stroke symptom onset.

    There is controversy as to whether early signs of infarct on CT are a contraindication to thrombolysis. The presence of CT evidence of infarction early in presentation has been associated with poor outcome and increased propensity for hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytics in some studies (3,4).  In the NINDS trial, there was no interaction between early infarction signs and tPA treatment for any clinical outcomes. Currently early signs of ischemia on CT are not generally considered to be a contraindication to use of tPA.  However, "frank hypointensity" on CT, particularly if it involves more than one third of an MCA territory, is a strong contraindication to treatment (1).

    References:
    (1 ) Latchaw et al.  Recommendations for imaging acute ischemic stroke:  A scientific statement from the American Heart Association  Stroke 2009;40:3646-78.
    (2) Patel SC, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke JAMA. 2001;286: 2830–2838.
    (3) von Kummer R, et al. Acute stroke: usefulness of early CT findings before thrombolytic therapy Radiology 1997;205(2):327-33.
    (4) Dzialowski I, et al. Extent of early ischemic changes on computed tomography (CT) before thrombolysis: prognostic value of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score in ECASS II Stroke 2006;37(4):973-8.

    D.  Acute Stroke with NIHSS Score of 0

    Physicians rely on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to evaluate patients with suspected acute stroke and to make decisions about acute treatment. The NIHSS correlates with infarct size, clinical severity, and long-term outcome. It is important to recognize, however, that ischemic stroke may cause symptoms that are not captured by the NIHSS scale.

    The NIHSS scale is highly weighted toward deficits caused by anterior circulation strokes, whereas deficits caused by posterior circulation strokes receive fewer points (1-3). Within the anterior circulation, the scale underestimates the degree of right versus left hemisphere injury (1,4). It is possible that some patients with persistent symptoms on arrival to ED and an NIHSS score of 0 still have an infarct (1).

    In a recent study, stroke patients with an NIHSS score of 0 most commonly presented with nausea, vomiting, and headache, all of which are associated with posterior circulation ischemia (1). Midline lesions of the cerebellum cause truncal ataxia, which is not part of the NIHSS. In addition, decreased visual acuity, Horner's syndrome, and memory impairments are neurologic deficits not captured by the NIHSS. Subtle limb weakness (4/5) in an upper motor neuron pattern (extensors of the arms or flexors of the legs) may not be observed on the motor component of the NIHSS.

    These data reinforce that the NIHSS cannot replace history and a thorough neurologic exam to diagnose acute stroke and that the NIHSS alone cannot be used to rule out a stroke in patients with acute persistent symptoms.

    References:
    (1) Martin-Schild S, et al. Zero on the NIHSS Does Not Equal the Absence of Stroke Ann Emerg Med 2011 Jan;57(1):42-5.
    (2) Libman RB, et al. Differences between anterior and posterior circulation stroke in TOAST Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;11:311-316.
    (3) Sato S, et al. Baseline NIH stroke scale score predicting outcome in anterior and posterior circulation strokes Neurology 2008;70:2371-2377.
    (4) Fink JN, et al. Is the association of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right- and left-hemisphere ischemic stroke? Stroke 2002;33:954-958.



    tPA in wonderland

    The last few years have been a whirlwind for lytics in stroke.

    What started out as the promised land has morphed into a veritable amazon forest. Whilst most agree with the basics and principles of it but the results have been far from convincing. Throw in some "fudgy" trial results with drug company sponsors and there is no wonder you have a growing skeptical audience.

    There are trials and studies abound in every country but I personally don't push the "snake venom" to patients who are older than 80. Most of my learned colleagues on this site and I think of reasons NOT to give tPA rather than to give. Our take:

    • Talk to your patients
    • Talk to your patients' families
    • They ned to to know NNH as well as NNT
    • Show them simple diagrams to understand the above sentence like this one

    Here's a fantastic PREZI look into the history of the relevant research:

    Drgdhs-adventures-in-wonderland

    Should you really crank up the resp rate?

    Here's an interesting argument which is researched and backed up by the folks at emeducation.

    Hyperventilation in TBI?

    Is it just a myth that has been compounded all along?
    Just another example of "tradition" based medicine?
    Certainly what we teach our residents is to target the CO2 to the lower limit of normal (ie 35mmHg).