Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Away on holiday... sort of.

We haven't disappeared from the FOAM world but have been on hiatus for education and holiday reasons. Happy new year to all our readers!
Singhealth has been actively involved in EM and disaster medicine in the region for decades. Not only are Singapore doctors sent on relief missions but also for educational outreach in non disaster times. Here are a few photos from a recent trip to give our perspective to Nepal EM docs, nurses and administrators on pre-hospital and hospital disaster management.
On a personal note, it was heartening to go back to Kathmandu and its environs as the last time I was there was during the Nepal earthquake and much has improved both socially and preparedness wise.

Group discussion and pre-presentation work 
Outdoor hospital prep
 
Triage table tops

Field team bag preparation 
How to moulage for excercises


Team presentation on their preparedness plans

The "dreaded" assessment - can't have learning without it!

Group pic

Transport is TRICI

The recent SEMS 2016 conference in Singapore was well received by attendees and its myriad of workshops/courses and talks continues to grow. This year, Changi General Hospital added a one day workshop to highlight the troubles in transporting critically ill patients. It involved lectures, simulation, quizzes and demos and lots of food.
"Shoutout" goes to Changi Simulation Institute for once again hosting and moulaging our sims.

TRANSPORT In the Critically Ill 
(aka TRICI)

What its all about - TRICI

Demonstrating practically our retrieval bag and contents

Dr Joanne Ang debriefing after a multi-stage simulation

No gain without pain
The actual quiz - learning without the stress of marks

Dr Charles Chan-Johnson (centre) & SSN Himmah (extreme left) giving a synopsis of actual ambulance transport

Ambulance ride along with mannequin


Teaching faculty of Dr Naleen and SSN Irene "treating" a critical patient

A/Prof Loh Lik Eng giving a paediatric transport primer
Feedback was encouraging and we plan to have more of the above. If you would like to join/participate/know more do send us an email.

Webucation 7/2/16


A Happy Lunar New Year to asian readers. Wisdom from the world this edition comes from specialities of trauma to tox and even some nerd evidence thrown in at the end. Do view and credit the original content creators.
The last link is once again superb dogmalysis. Tech does not solve ALL our problems. Some we bring onto ourselves.

Webucation 13/12/15


This episode of web wisdom hails from the realms of almost all specialities. Make sure you visit the content on the sites and all credit to them.
The last link is a great resource for a population that goes under our radar. Good to know it is a safe, universal strategy nowadays to start analgesia first and then followed by sedation. 

Blazing admissions with ZDogg MD

Dr Zubin Damania burns up the airwaves as well as airways and hallways in this institutionalised rendition of the R Kelly classic. It all rings true if you can keep up with the lyrics. Keep it up ZDogg!

Webucation 2/7/15

Web wisdom this edition comes from areas of urology, general surgery, trauma and paeds. As always, give credit to the content creators.


The last link is a gem in mnemonics. It also has a great Rule of 3's for infantile colic. Great site for paeds. Do visit it.

Video guide to FOAM

For those familiar with FOAM, this should not come as a surprise. However if you are new to Free Open Access Medical Education and Social Media Med Ed, this video explains it quite succinctly. It goes through the various means of information acquisition and a few steps further into how to content create and add to the global repository of FOAM Emergency Medicine.

The Art and Science of Clinical Decision Making

Clinical decision making is an important skill physicians utilise in their daily work. It may not be well taught in medical school as a distinct process, but knowing how physicians think, come to a diagnosis or generate a list of differentials, and make a decision on testing or treating, is an important first step in figuring out how the process work and how to make the best decisions.
Take this real case as an example:
A middle aged man with a past history of hypertension and old stroke with good recovery presented to the ED after he was punched repeatedly in the face and head. There was no loss of consciousness nor amnesia, but patient complained of dizziness and 2 episodes of vomiting at presentation. There were no neck complaints or other injuries.
GCS was 15, there were bilateral periorbital swelling, abrasions on the face as well as minor scalp hematoma and lacerations. There was no neurological deficit and cervical spine was examined normal. CT head was reported as no acute intracranial hemorrhage or infarct and CT face showed right orbital floor and left medial orbital wall fractures. ENT and EYE doctors on duty both saw the patient, were happy with their evaluations, and patient was discharged with close followup in the SOC.
However, patient represented 36 hours later with persistent dizziness and 3 further episodes of vomiting. At the morning of presentation, wife found patient slightly drowsy and he also complained of pain around both eyes and generalised weakness. Right pupil could be seen and was reactive and brisk. Left pupil was obscured by eyelid swelling. Neurological exam was repeated, determined to be patient's baseline and neck remained supple. A repeat plain CT brain was performed, and reported with findings as before; there were no suspected intracranial bleeding, delayed or otherwise.
Should we now proceed to dispose of this patient as post-concussion syndrome with admission or observation? Or is there something else?
Post-concussion syndrome is a possibility here, and the diagnosis is made based on a heuristic known as 'pattern recognition'. It doesn't require much thinking, and we draw upon our past experience or exposure to similar cases or patterns of presentation.
In this case, a patient presenting with minor head injury as the initial problem, now re-presenting with probable neurological complaints of dizziness and vomiting, must be having a condition related to the head injury in the 1st place (or so we assume).
But, this type of heuristic thinking may be fraught with certain biases, like anchoring bias and premature closure.
So, the ED team switched to another type of heuristics, this time using analytical thinking. We simply sat down and thought about the other differential diagnoses that were possible with this patient's re-presentation, and worked through the patient's symptoms, signs, and probabilities for each of the differential. Of course, we had a bit of help from Google's friendly search and Uptodate.
Not surprisingly, one of the differentials came out as a prime suspect. The gummed up left eye of this patient, in which we could not see the pupil, had a hazy cornea. We called EYE to come put a tonometer on patient's left eye as we suspected traumatic secondary glaucoma. The pressure in patient's left eye measured 80 mmHg. The diagnosis was made, and patient was immediately started on eyedrops and azetalomide.
If we had admitted the patient as before, he might not have the diagnosis made until many hours later when the respective specialties perform the reviews as inpatient. Who knew if the patient's sight might or might not have been compromised.
Therefore I urge all readers to read the following article on "The Art and Science of Clinical Decision Making", examine your thought processes and clinical decisions as you continue  in your daily practice. You will be surprised and amply rewarded.

Battle with honour!

Simulation warfare had its sensational debut at the SEMS ASM 2014 in Changi General Hospital. The inaugural competition's highlights are shown below. Do sign up for the 2015 edition if interested!

Viva la evidence

Though an oldie, still a goldie. James' McCormack's music and EBM skills put to the fore. Lovers of both Coldplay and journal clubs will appreciate this!

Everything works, nothing works.

One of the best talks at the SMACC conference this year was by Dr Victoria Brazil (@SocraticEM). She is a FACEM with huge educational experience and she gives a cutting and realistic insight to the world of education in EM. This is a must see for anyone associated with medical education.
If she's an "intern" in the education scene, then we are but fleas passing by...

Kudos to the smacc team for release and share of the talk and slides.

Victoria Brazil Evidence-Based Education- What Works-- from Social Media and Critical Care on Vimeo.



Speaking up to your senior consultant

Imagine this scenario:
You are seeing this sick patient with acute respiratory failure. It appears intubation is imminent as the patient is hypoxic and mentally obtunded despite high flow oxygen. Your consultant comes in and make a quick assessment:
Consultant: "Ok, looks like we need to intubate this patient. MO, get an ABG right now! Quick quick!"
You: "Errrmmm, really? Do an ABG now? I thought we're going to intubate..."
Consultant: "NO! Don't argue. I want an ABG now. Just do it..."
You: "Ooookkkkaaayyy....."

Sounds familiar? Have you ever been in a situation where you were told to do something by your senior that you felt was not right at that time? Did you just keep quiet and do as you were told? Did you just do it because it was your senior who said it and that was ok?
I would say, that the right thing to do, would be to speak up, and point out the mistake to the senior. This is even more important if you think the error might result in patient harm. In this day and age, when we function in teams and go for team simulation training, the value of each team member cannot be undermined. Every member of the team, no matter how junior, has a role to play. It is important to feedback all information to the team leader, and to point out mistakes or errors promptly, tactfully and with respect. This is vital to the team's success. Therefore, the days of authority based medicine, or "my consultant said so" should be over and done with.
MOs and Residents, learn how to give feedback to your seniors. This can be learnt throughout your residency, or even in the Resus room. And seniors, learn to take feedback from your juniors without pride or prejudice. The communication is important for team function, and patient safety.
Our senior registrars are great examples. They have been through residency and AST, and may know more than their senior consultants in terms of the latest updates and evidence. Seniors can sometimes be wrong too.
Take this scenario for example:
A male presenting with DKA, had now developed worsening SOB and hypoxemia. It appears acute pulmonary edema was developing after the fluid boluses, and repeated ECG showed a possible STEMI. Patient had been intubated successfully and we're about to adjust the ventilator:
Me : "OK, patient's doing well, SPO2 is up, let's cut down the FiO2 and the respiratory rate."
Registrar : "Errrmm, are you sure Dr Ang? I would keep the respiratory rate high; above twenty if possible..."
Me (testily) : "Why, may I ask?"
Registrar : "Don't forget about the acidosis... that's one of his primary problems."
Me (roll eyes) : "OMG, you're right. I'm such an idiot! Thanks for pointing that out..."

SEMS ASM Wrap

SEMS ASM just wrapped in Changi General Hospital and it was one for the ages. Karim Brohi, Colin Parker, Dan Davis, Aper Cevik and a host of local talent as well - all who shall be illuminated in our forthcoming video releases for the conference in the spirit of FOAM.

The show-stopper was of course SIMWARS and here's a brief perspective from the Turkish contigent who came.

Mama's rules

Too good not to post!
from: [Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:688-689.]
The author is a Professor of Emergency Medicine and Associate Dean for Health Policy at Emory University. These remarks were given at the Emory School of Medicine’s 2008 commencement ceremony.
Class of 2008, you are one of the last to graduate under the Emory School of Medicine’s traditional (some might say “old”) curriculum. It followed the same general structure as mine, except you had 28 years of additional scientific and clinical discoveries to learn. It challenged you, like NPR radio detective Guy Noir, “to find answers to life’s persistent questions.” But you didn’t have to answer them all at once.
During your first 2 years of medical school, you spent most of your time pondering what and whereWhat molecule, hormone, physiologic function, pathological process, bone or nerve causes what effect? And where is the dad-gum thing located in the body?
After mastering what and where, you spent the last 2 years of med school seeking answers to how and whenHow to perform an efficient history and physical, how to do all sorts of clinical procedures, how to present patients on rounds. And when to order a test or treatment, when not to; when to dazzle your attending with your brilliance, and when to avert your gaze and hope she or he would call on someone else. …
But before we turn you loose, I want you to spend a few moments pondering the most important question of all: why.
Let me explain why this is necessary. When you start your residency a few weeks from now, life’s persistent questions will no longer march up, 2 by 2. They’ll come in a howling mob, often at the most unexpected times. And if you aren’t careful, you’ll become so focused on whatwherehow, and when that you’ll lose sight of why.
The following story illustrates my point.
Before I begin, I need to explain one thing: the specifics of this story require me to identify the resident’s specialty. But make no mistake: all of us, regardless of specialty, are prone to the mindset this resident displayed.
The incident was sparked by disagreement over who would admit a patient. The individual in question, a homeless man, literally dragged himself into the Grady ED. Recently discharged from the hospital after surgery for bilateral tibia fractures, he had external fixators on both legs. Unable to care for himself on the streets, he’d come back. The skin around his hardware showed early signs of infection.
The ortho resident was called. After completing his assessment, he refused to admit the patient. “This guy’s no longer our problem.” He declared, “His fractures are fixed. All he needs are antibiotics and a care home. Admit him to Medicine if you want. We only admit patients who need surgery. ”
Needless to say, this decision didn’t sit well with the emergency medicine resident (or a nearby internal medicine resident). Tempers flared, and voices were quickly raised. On-looking patients, including the man with 2 broken legs, heard it all as 3 young, gifted, and highly educated doctors argued bitterly over who “had” to take care of the patient.
That’s when a faculty colleague, Dr. Ric Martinez, stepped in. Like many attending physicians at Grady, Ric has a distinguished pedigree. A member of the Institute of Medicine, Ric directed a major federal agency during the Clinton Administration. Today, he’s back at Emory doing what he loves most: teaching, and caring for patients.
“What seems to be the problem?” Ric asked.
The ortho resident, red-faced, described “the problem.”
Ric answered, “It’s clear that this guy can’t make it on the street. Since he was so recently discharged from your service, don’t you think you should take him back, and make better arrangements for his care?”
“I am not admitting this patient!” The resident boomed. “We only admit patients who need surgery!”
“Look,” Ric said, “I’m not going to argue with you. Pick up the phone.”
“You want to talk to my attending?” The resident glared as he reached for the phone.
“No,” Ric replied. “I want to talk to your mother. It’s 9 pm. I know she’s awake. If you can convince her that you’re doing the right thing, I’ll accept her decision and make other arrangements for the patient. Do you think she’ll agree with you?”
The resident stared at Ric, his jaw clenched. Then, the lines on his face relaxed. He smiled, hung up the phone, and began writing admission orders for the patient.
Mama’s rules.
Class of 2008, nothing you’ve learned in the last 4 years, and nothing you’ll learn in the next 4, is as important as what your family and friends taught you before you came medical school. They, and others who could not be here, gave you the answers to whyWhy you chose to become a physician. Why you spent all those hours studying in college. Why you worked like a dog for the last 4 years. And why, in a few minutes, you will recite the Hippocratic Oath.
A few weeks from now, you’ll walk into a hospital or clinic. Before you know it, you will be challenged to balance the pressures of modern health care, the expectations of your peers, and your own pride against the best interests of your patients. When you are unsure what to do, place an imaginary phone call to Mama, or whoever serves as your inner guide. She’ll know what to do.
To demonstrate the power of this technique, I want to walk you through a hypothetical scenario: This is your last exam. It’s pass/fail. During work rounds, a utilization review nurse pokes her head in the door and informs you that one of your patients has used up his days of insurance coverage and must be discharged. You know that this particular patient isn’t stable enough to be released, but the look on your attending’s face offers no support.
Do you tell the nurse and your attending that your patient isn’t ready to go home and forcefully explain why or accept the decision as “the way things are” and discharge the patient?
Show of hands: How many for option A? Option B? Good! See how easy this is?
Class of 2008, I bid you farewell. Go forth with my best wishes and my respect. And don’t forget: when the going gets tough, and you aren’t sure what to do, remember “Mama’s rules.” For if you do, the answer will come, clear as a sounding bell.

Flipped classroom

A burgeoning concept which is gaining traction in medical communities as well. We recently tried this at our residency teaching with generally positive reviews. Admittedly, not all medical teaching can be done this way but its worth a try. Thanks to knewton.com for allowing users to embed this.


Flipped Classroom
Flipped classroom

Created by Knewton and Column Five Media

Right on Target – In a Blink

Prof Goh Siang Hiong is someone that does not need an introduction in our Emergency Medicine fraternity. He is an educator with many awards, and also my mentor and teacher. Recently, in the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Emergency Medicine in Singapore, he gave this top notch lecture on heuristics and critical thinking in emergency medicine. We re-recorded it for the benefit of everyone (especially residents!) and here it is.

Reflections of a social creature

We are social creatures. Sometimes we need to meet just to know we like to meet. 

The recent SEMS Annual Scientific Meeting 2013 in Singapore was a blur of activity. From the pre-conference workshops (hypothermia, tox, airway) to the 2 day main schedule packed with goodness to the torrent of information made available to the post conference options. All this interspersed by food glorious food (the obligatory Singapore past-time). 
Some of the plenary highlights included A/Prof Benjamin Abella taking us to the cutting edge of Emergency Medicine. His personal examples of tele-medicine and networked care showed us not just a swish vision of the the future but the glories of the present as well.
Break out sessions yielded more treasure of pearls & nuggets from actual ED experience. From current toxicology to established paediatrics to future education trends. Following sessions encompassed the ever challenging fields of critical care, trauma and pre hospital care.


One of these was a robust trauma session gave us aphorisms aplenty. My personal favourite has to be: 

"The only time my registrar is allowed to use the word "stable" in a P1 trauma case 
when there is an actual horse in the ED"
More wisdom ensued with Prof Peter Manning listing the words that should never pass your lips in an ED. Samples of blasphemy included:
  • Its not a heart attack
  • There's no rib #
  • Let him sleep it off
More snippets and full talks can be had here for those who couldn't make it.

The pervading theme that was intoxicating throughout the whole conference centre though, was one of sheer camaraderie. A feeling that only comes with a shared experience. A brotherhood of sorts or, a fellowship if you will, which transcends geography, experience, finance and politics. All cognizant of the historical truth that the human race only got better when we exchanged perspectives and collaborated.

Few things are comparable to the unbridled joy of kinship. Knowing that across the globe, "pit docs" just like you work in the same proverbial trenches and face the same access block, chronic under resourcing, educational challenges, interdepartmental woes and enforced performance indicators. However, allied to this are their similar aspirations for their department, the longing for open access education, the desire for equipoise in research and a little more office space (oh yes, its the same cramped junkyard all over the world)! 


I've been to numerous congresses for over the decade on many continents and the fellowship is always a source of warmth, but it's gratifying to have it in your own backyard for once. So kudos to the organisers (the chair being Emergence Phenomena's own Dr Phua DH) and we shall see you at next year st SEMS 2014 - for social creatures are we...

SMACC Day One highlights

Here I am at SMACC, second day and enjoying every minute. To those who still do not know about SMACC, check it out at SMACC.net.au for possibly the bestest and coolest Crit care conference to date. Also check out your favorite blogs for posts on SMACC.

Day One highlights
Coolest  opening sequence for a conference ever. An amazing skit followed by a cinematic quality opening video clip. Scott Weingart was in top form, delivering possibly one of the best opening talks I've heard him give. Upstairs care downstairs has been his mantra for some time, but I like his new one - maximally aggressive care always - maximally aggressive curative care and maximally aggressive palliative care.

John Myburgh followed with a great talk about catecholamines in resuscitation. MSFP; wonder what that is? Ask the hemodynamicists out there, it's certainly not a new concept, but I gotta read up on Guyton. I will also mention 2 great articles in Jan 2013 issue of Crit Care Med on hemodynamic physiology : go read! John gave another great talk on fluid resuscitation later on. I fully agree with his take on fluids; if you don't see the fluid loss, the patient is likely not benefitting from the excess drip. In my opinion, a limited fluid strategy is probably the way forward in sepsis resuscitation. I'll stand by USCOM and hemodynamic guided therapy.

Anthony Delaney shared a little bit on the ARISE trial - can't wait for the results of that one. Good talk on the goal posts of EGDT.

But John Myburgh summed it all up nicely - see the patient, not some number!

The afternoon was deep. The full panel of online greats got down and dirty talking about the nitty gritty of social media, FOAMed and issues pertaining. What an eye opener. Next, Joe Lex did his best as usual, giving up his treasure trove of quotes from Hippocrates to Osler.

Last but not least, Simon Carly was all James Bond cool Brit and all. I like it. Wish you were here RG! Did you know, the cogs of SMACC and FOAM started turning way back in ICEM, Dublin, over some Irish stout surely?! I remembered a certain train ride from Dublin to Cork...


“No army can withstand the strength of an idea whose time has come.” Victor Hugo



SMACC talk

There is a sea change in the ED community with THIS conference.
Not only are new concepts or info delivery being debated, the way the debate is framed and transmitted itself has changed.
If you aren't lucky enough to get down under - get the apps. Also available here.
That's the beauty of FOAMEd.

The danger of science denial

Something different but we all need a rallying call every now and then against the forces of ignorance.
This is a talk from TEDed - the education aspect of the superb TED talks series. He is not a doctor but he puts across his well thought out medical argument very well. The highlight for me was "Big Placebo".





Maybe one day we will have critical mass to get us to the next phase of planetary evolution. Meanwhile, educate away.