Despite being a relatively common cause for presentation to Emergency Departments, there is often some confusion over the best imaging modality for identification and localisation of foreign bodies.
Of course some foreign bodies don't require imaging at all, but if there is uncertainty as to the presence of a foreign body or its precise location, there are a few basic rules that can help decide the initial modality of choice.
And now for some pretty examples...
Of course some foreign bodies don't require imaging at all, but if there is uncertainty as to the presence of a foreign body or its precise location, there are a few basic rules that can help decide the initial modality of choice.
Plain Radiography
- excellent for detection of dense foreign material in the peripheries (glass, metal)
- excellent for detection of foreign bodies within the abdomen (particularly bowel/rectum)
- not useful for plant or other organic material in the peripheries
- can be difficult around the orbits and jaw
Ultrasound
- excellent for subcutaneous foreign bodies of any density
- particularly useful for wood/splinters, marine spines
- good for assessing associated tendon/ligament injuries
- can be used for removal of foreign body in real-time
- can not see through bone and has difficulty seeing through air (for example sand/gravel in messy open wounds can be hard)
Computed Tomography
- modality of choice for swallowed fishbones and orbital foreign bodies
- good for all densities of foreign body
- good for problem solving difficult cases
- good for localising small foreign bodies within joints
- probably overkill for most clinical scenarios
And now for some pretty examples...
Bullet in Brain |
Ginger Ale in Rectum |
Palm Frond in Shin |
Shotgun Pellets to Leg |
Stingray Barb to Foot |
Fish Bone to Foramen Transversarium |
Swallowed Matchbox Car in Descending Colon |
Wood in Maxillary Sinus |
No comments:
Post a Comment